dynamic vs var

A while ago, on a beautiful evening of a wonderful weekend I had a mug of beer in my hand and a thought striked, what’s new in C# 4.0. I searched on google and started to look into the results and suddenly I stopped to get a hang of the term ‘dynamic’, well obviously I googled again and burrowed deeper into it. After a couple of minutes (read hours) I got aquainted to the idea of ‘dynamic’ but could not understand its need as we already had ‘var’ (thanks to C# 3.0). This made me anxious and I started to look out for the need of ‘dynamic’ and the difference between ‘var and ‘dynamic’. Following are my findings


‘var’ was introduced in c# 3.0 and steadily got popular among geeks. Variable declared with var are implicitly but statically typed. By statically typed I mean that the type of variable declared is decided by compiler at compile time. So to let compiler decide what type of variable it is, as we need to initailize it at declaration. i.e.

var myName ; //Here compiler will show error as we didn’t initialize it and compiler is not able to decide its type
var myName = “XYZ” ; // So here compiler is happy as compiler know that it’s string type

myName = 45; //Compiler wil show error as myName is already string type and now i am assigning and integer to it

So by following example it’s clear that once compiler decided that a variable is string type then that variable will always be string type in it’s scope.
By doing it statically type the errors are caught at compile time and we also have the benifit of intellisense as compiler already know it’s type. i.e.

Console.WriteLine(myName.BeerWasGreat()); //This will show error on compile time as string doesn’t have any ‘BeerWasGreat’ method.

By reading all this about ‘var’ a thought can roll in any time i.e. Why use var when we know it’s type ie. String, int etc. Let me clarify

Where to use var
var is a splendid idea to help implement a key principle of good programming: DRY, i.e., Don’t Repeat Yourself.
VeryComplicatedType x = new VeryComplicatedType();
is bad coding, because it repeats VeryComplicatedType, and the effects are all negative: more verbose and boilerplatey code, less readability, silly “makework” for both the reader and the writer of the code. Because of all this, I count var as a very useful enhancement in C# 3.0.

So the above should be done as

var x = new VeryComplicatedType();
var is also useful in making anonymous type and here i am not going in detail of it. So for now that’s it for var and now move to dynamic


Dynamic has been introduced in C# 4.0. Variables declared as dynamic are dynamic type. By dynamic type I mean that type of variable declared is decided by compiler at run time. So there is no need to initialize the dynamic type at declaration time i.e.

dynamic myName; //This will work fine but need to assign later before running otherwise it will ` show error

myName = “XYZ”; //This will work fine and myName is a String

myName = 45 ; //Again this will work fine and now myName is integer

So by example it is quite clear that type of variable is decided on run time based on the last assigned object.
As type of dynamic variables is decided on run time so we are not able to use intellisense and also errors come up on run time rather than compile time i.e.

Console.WriteLine(myName.BeerWasGreat()); //This will show error on run time.

Where to use dynamic
Simple as with dynamic, properties / methods / operators / etc are resolved at runtime, based on the actual object. So it’s handy for talking to COM (which can have runtime-only properties), the DLR, or other dynamic systems, like javascript

A Last Thought
It’s beautiful to see how statically typed languges are moving toward dynamically typed (e.g. C#) and how dynamically typed languages are moving towards statically typed (i.e. javascript if someone is using typescript). Both programming worlds have their own advantages,disadvantages and limitations and with c# it’s wonderfull to taste both the worlds. Well I am in love with C# (read beer 🙂 )

If you want to know more about dynamic and where to use it please go through the following

If you like this article and want to write me back to discuss over this furthur, you are welcome to leave comments or you can write me on my Email Id ashishk@mindfiresolutions.com.
Don’t forget to like and share..:)

Written By: Ashish Kumar, Software Engineer, Mindfire Solutions


Posted on March 26, 2014, in C# and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: